Mayor Eric Adams is reigniting the debate about whether undocumented residents accused of crimes should be handed over to federal immigration officials before their criminal cases go through due process. His recent comments have raised questions about New York City’s sanctuary law, which limits cooperation with federal authorities to those convicted of serious crimes. As the Trump administration looms, Adams has been reaching out to appeal to the incoming administration, hinting at the possibility of suspending sanctuary laws as an emergency measure.
New York City has a long history of not reporting undocumented residents to federal immigration authorities, with policies dating back to the 1980s. Changes in cooperation between the city and ICE have been driven by concerns about deporting those accused of minor crimes or those without prior criminal records. The city’s sanctuary law, strengthened in 2014, restricts cooperation with ICE and limits detainer requests, although critics have expressed concerns about the legislation being a gift to criminals.
Recent remarks by Mayor Adams, including an erroneous statement about due process for immigrants, have sparked backlash from within his party and mayoral challengers. While Adams has defended his stance by highlighting the city’s assistance to migrants, City Council members and advocates argue that the sanctuary law is crucial in ensuring due process for all individuals within the city, including undocumented immigrants.
In a recent interview, Adams clarified his position, affirming that the Constitution applies to all individuals, including undocumented immigrants, and stating that the dialogue is focused on repeat offenders. Despite the controversy, the sanctuary law remains in place, providing protection and due process to undocumented residents in New York City.
Source
Photo credit gothamist.com