Controversy surrounding the Hugo Awards has arisen due to leaked emails suggesting that certain works were excluded from consideration for political reasons related to China. The emails indicate that the selection committee deemed works by Neil Gaiman and R.F. Kuang “ineligible” for the ballot due to concerns about content and censorship under Chinese laws. This decision led to accusations of the Hugos engaging in censorship, effectively disqualifying some authors from the esteemed award.
The Hugo Awards are considered a prestigious honor in the science fiction and fantasy genre, and fans were dismayed when the leaked emails revealed that nominations for Gaiman’s The Sandman and Kuang’s Babel were seemingly suppressed. The controversy stems from the 2023 World Science Fiction Convention, held in Chengdu, China, where the selection process for the awards took place. Concerns arose when the names of certain authors and their works appeared as ineligible in the nominating statistics released 91 days after the event.
The potential influence of the Chinese government in censoring the award nominations was speculated, given the political nature of the excluded works and their discussions of China. However, Hugo Awards executive Dave McCarty denied any official communication with the Chinese government in a Facebook post. The leaked emails from committee members indicated that nominees whose works focused on China, Taiwan, or Tibet were carefully scrutinized to determine their eligibility for the award, and certain authors were disqualified for these reasons.
Artists implicated in the controversy, including Gaiman, Kuang, and Xiran Jay Zhao, expressed their disappointment and dissatisfaction with the Hugos’ decision, with some accusing the committee of cowardice and illegitimacy. Kuang particularly pointed out that her work was eligible for other prestigious awards but was deemed ineligible by the Hugos, suggesting that it was a matter of “undesirability” rather than true ineligibility. The outcry from affected authors has sparked discussions within the sci-fi and fantasy community about the integrity of the Hugo Awards and the implications of censorship within the genre.
Source
Photo credit www.vulture.com