MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred initially rejected the idea of the “Golden At-Bat” rule when it was suggested on “The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz” in 2015, calling it “crazy” and stating that it would interfere with the history and traditions of the game. This rule would allow managers to sub in star hitters at any point during the game, fundamentally changing the sport by making elite hitters even more valuable and altering player evaluations. While some fans and analysts are intrigued by the idea, others like Mike Francesa have vehemently opposed it, with Francesa even saying he would refuse to watch baseball if the rule was implemented. The notion of changing a fundamental aspect of the game that has been in place for decades has sparked debate among baseball enthusiasts and experts. Despite the initial skepticism from Manfred and others, the concept of the “Golden At-Bat” rule raises interesting questions about how the game could evolve and adapt to modern preferences for more action and star power. As discussions about potential rule changes in baseball continue, it will be interesting to see if the sport embraces new ideas like the “Golden At-Bat” rule or if tradition will ultimately prevail.
Source
Photo credit nypost.com
Rob Manfred dismisses ‘Golden At-Bat’ rule as a waste of time
