The upcoming United States presidential election is unfolding as a closely contested race between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. While polls show the candidates running neck and neck, an interesting indicator of potential election outcomes lies in the performance of the stock market.
Historical data since 1928 reveals that the S&P 500, which tracks 500 of the largest US-listed firms, has accurately predicted the winner in 20 out of 24 elections. Specifically, when US stocks have increased in the three months leading up to the election, the incumbent party has typically retained the White House. Conversely, a declining market has often signaled a change in leadership.
Currently, with the S&P 500 up by 11.8 percent since early August, the trends seem to favor Harris. However, the relationship between stock market performance and voter sentiment towards the economy is not always straightforward. Despite positive economic indicators such as GDP growth and low unemployment rates, consumer sentiment remains largely negative, with concerns about rising prices outpacing wage growth.
Moreover, recent political events have shown that traditional forecasting models may not always hold true. Trump’s unexpected victory in 2016, despite a positive stock market trend, serves as a reminder that politics in the current era defy conventional wisdom.
As the election nears, the influence of the stock market on voter decisions remains a complex factor in determining the outcome. While it may offer some insights into potential winners, the broader economic landscape and shifting political dynamics suggest that the ultimate decider will likely be the voters themselves.
Source
Photo credit www.aljazeera.com