An advertisement promising free solar panels and a new roof in exchange for signing a 25-year contract with a solar company named SUNco turned into a nightmare for 76-year-old Queens homeowner Claver Campbell. Despite assurances from the salesperson, Campbell felt the contract was deceptive as it did not mention government programs that would help cover the costs. An investigation revealed that her e-signature was forged on two separate contracts, making her liable for a significant amount of money. Campbell has now filed a lawsuit against SUNco and Solar Mosaic, their lending partner, alleging fraud, discrimination, and violations of federal law.
This case sheds light on predatory practices within the rooftop solar industry, with companies using aggressive marketing strategies and complex financial arrangements to exploit vulnerable homeowners. Numerous lawsuits and complaints from other customers highlight a pattern of deception and coercion by solar companies. The in-depth investigation into Campbell’s situation has exposed the questionable practices employed by some within the industry and is prompting calls for increased oversight and regulation.
As Campbell continues to fight for justice, the broader conversation around rooftop solar and the need for stronger consumer protections is gaining momentum. State and federal regulators are being called upon to hold companies accountable for their actions and ensure that homeowners are not taken advantage of. This case serves as a cautionary tale for consumers considering solar installations and underscores the importance of researching and verifying companies before signing contracts.
Source
Photo credit nysfocus.com